Research history

Current published edition

Source depth

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-11-07-encyclopedia
Edition checksum
e146b1666792c4b20504af099ca65663d0f70fea584397f38cb5eda241137bde
Projection checksum
a017dac8fb17a969a8d72ae660365d8c9a3840125e29cb258e797f50a27552ed
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 69Stable records
  • 71Subject versions
  • 69Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

66 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

Source depth · Encyclopedia entry · version 1
Source review: draft

concept:source-depth

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: Source depth

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
5ba4e9376e58ad4ee4ced5479b0609d8a9dcc331db826a2dfac70f16c25e114e
Version checksum
83bc8535cc196ebdfebbf206c6bdf18a138d688cca413322dd127a4462003c2f
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
aliases
[
  "depth scale",
  "depth",
  "relief to source"
]
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "symptom-trap"
  },
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "measurement-gap"
  }
]
related
[
  "/method/",
  "/record/encyclopedia/symptoms-and-sources/",
  "/record/principles/03-depth-from-relief-to-source/",
  "/open-problems/the-depth-census/",
  "/open-problems/measuring-the-source/"
]
summary
Charitology’s five-level scale for where a piece of work acts on the chain from symptom to source, from relief through repair, prevention and structure to source. It describes the work. It never grades it.
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

**Source depth** says where on the chain from [symptom to source](/record/encyclopedia/symptoms-and-sources/) a piece of work acts. Charitology uses a five-level scale, numbered 0 to 4, set out in [the Method](/method/#depth). Every gift, program and organization can be described with it.

## The five levels

| Level | Name | What it does | Examples |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | Relief | Meets the need today | A meal at a food bank, emergency surgery, a disaster shelter |
| 1 | Repair | Restores what was lost | Rebuilding a home, rehabilitation after an injury, a job after a layoff |
| 2 | Prevention | Stops it happening to these people | Bed nets, vaccines, clean water for a village |
| 3 | Structure | Changes the rules that produce it | A lead-paint ban, a new public health system, a corporate standard |
| 4 | Source | Changes what feeds many problems at once | The story a society tells itself, how people coordinate, what a culture rewards |

Each level has a test question. Relief asks whether someone is fed, sheltered or treated right now. Repair asks whether someone is back where they were before the harm. Prevention asks whether these people will avoid the harm altogether. Structure asks whether a law, institution, market or norm changed so the harm stops being produced. Source asks whether something upstream of a whole family of problems changed.

## Depth describes. It never grades.

Every level is needed. Immediate food matters to a hungry person tonight, and a change at the source can take a generation to arrive. A deeper level is not a better level, and nothing in the scale says a food bank matters less than a policy campaign. The scale exists so that a giver knows what they are paying for, and so the field can ask whether the system’s overall mix is right. That is the question behind the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/).

## How to place a piece of work

- **Classify the activity, not the cause.** One cause has work at every depth. Homelessness has emergency shelters (relief), rehousing (repair), eviction prevention (prevention) and zoning reform (structure).
- **Classify what the money does, not the mission statement.** One organization can work at several depths. Weight each activity by what it spends.
- **Say when it is hard to call.** Boundaries between levels are fuzzy. How often two independent people place the same work at the same level is itself worth measuring.

## The top of the scale

Level 4 comes from Humanity’s Checklist, which argues that world problems grow from six shared sources: the story we tell, how we coordinate, what we can picture, what our feeds reward, what we admire and who gets to build. Charitology treats the claim that changing them would help everything downstream as a hypothesis to test.

## What this project has not established

Charitology has not produced a public estimate of the world’s giving by depth and has not established the current mix. Measuring it is [Open Problem 1, the Depth Census](/open-problems/the-depth-census/). Measuring the effect of source-level work, which is diffuse, shared and slow, is [Open Problem 3](/open-problems/measuring-the-source/).
Cited evidence
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-encyclopedia-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "83bc8535cc196ebdfebbf206c6bdf18a138d688cca413322dd127a4462003c2f",
  "id": "version:concept-source-depth-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "concept:source-depth",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:encyclopedia-source-depth-v1"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\n**Source depth** says where on the chain from [symptom to source](/record/encyclopedia/symptoms-and-sources/) a piece of work acts. Charitology uses a five-level scale, numbered 0 to 4, set out in [the Method](/method/#depth). Every gift, program and organization can be described with it.\n\n## The five levels\n\n| Level | Name | What it does | Examples |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 0 | Relief | Meets the need today | A meal at a food bank, emergency surgery, a disaster shelter |\n| 1 | Repair | Restores what was lost | Rebuilding a home, rehabilitation after an injury, a job after a layoff |\n| 2 | Prevention | Stops it happening to these people | Bed nets, vaccines, clean water for a village |\n| 3 | Structure | Changes the rules that produce it | A lead-paint ban, a new public health system, a corporate standard |\n| 4 | Source | Changes what feeds many problems at once | The story a society tells itself, how people coordinate, what a culture rewards |\n\nEach level has a test question. Relief asks whether someone is fed, sheltered or treated right now. Repair asks whether someone is back where they were before the harm. Prevention asks whether these people will avoid the harm altogether. Structure asks whether a law, institution, market or norm changed so the harm stops being produced. Source asks whether something upstream of a whole family of problems changed.\n\n## Depth describes. It never grades.\n\nEvery level is needed. Immediate food matters to a hungry person tonight, and a change at the source can take a generation to arrive. A deeper level is not a better level, and nothing in the scale says a food bank matters less than a policy campaign. The scale exists so that a giver knows what they are paying for, and so the field can ask whether the system’s overall mix is right. That is the question behind the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/).\n\n## How to place a piece of work\n\n- **Classify the activity, not the cause.** One cause has work at every depth. Homelessness has emergency shelters (relief), rehousing (repair), eviction prevention (prevention) and zoning reform (structure).\n- **Classify what the money does, not the mission statement.** One organization can work at several depths. Weight each activity by what it spends.\n- **Say when it is hard to call.** Boundaries between levels are fuzzy. How often two independent people place the same work at the same level is itself worth measuring.\n\n## The top of the scale\n\nLevel 4 comes from Humanity’s Checklist, which argues that world problems grow from six shared sources: the story we tell, how we coordinate, what we can picture, what our feeds reward, what we admire and who gets to build. Charitology treats the claim that changing them would help everything downstream as a hypothesis to test.\n\n## What this project has not established\n\nCharitology has not produced a public estimate of the world’s giving by depth and has not established the current mix. Measuring it is [Open Problem 1, the Depth Census](/open-problems/the-depth-census/). Measuring the effect of source-level work, which is diffuse, shared and slow, is [Open Problem 3](/open-problems/measuring-the-source/).\n",
    "collection": "encyclopedia",
    "frontmatter": {
      "aliases": [
        "depth scale",
        "depth",
        "relief to source"
      ],
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "symptom-trap"
        },
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "measurement-gap"
        }
      ],
      "related": [
        "/method/",
        "/record/encyclopedia/symptoms-and-sources/",
        "/record/principles/03-depth-from-relief-to-source/",
        "/open-problems/the-depth-census/",
        "/open-problems/measuring-the-source/"
      ],
      "sources": [
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Humanity’s Checklist",
          "title": "Humanity’s Checklist: six things to fix so we can fix everything else",
          "url": "https://humanityschecklist.org/",
          "year": 2026
        }
      ],
      "summary": "Charitology’s five-level scale for where a piece of work acts on the chain from symptom to source, from relief through repair, prevention and structure to source. It describes the work. It never grades it.",
      "title": "Source depth"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "5ba4e9376e58ad4ee4ced5479b0609d8a9dcc331db826a2dfac70f16c25e114e",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
65; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Additional exact-source encyclopedia coverage. Earlier authorship, source reading, independent review and historical event dates remain unknown.

Observed baseline: version 1.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "de03533d7ea00d3f6b8efcee8c8d31c862252698c10493607635a9e1b8f3f511",
  "id": "event:concept-source-depth-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 65,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Additional exact-source encyclopedia coverage. Earlier authorship, source reading, independent review and historical event dates remain unknown.",
  "recordId": "concept:source-depth",
  "recordedAt": "2026-11-07T23:20:18.679Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "concept:source-depth",
    "subjectHash": "5ba4e9376e58ad4ee4ced5479b0609d8a9dcc331db826a2dfac70f16c25e114e",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim